Text File

Aucbvax.5185 fa.unix-wizards utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!unix-wizards Sun Nov 15 17:27:27 1981 uninterpreted shell lines >From BH@MIT-AI Sun Nov 15 16:45:16 1981 On the issue of programs not running because the shell still parses the * and (maybe) doesn't find any files, this is perfectly okay for the application for which I originally proposed this feature, namely a "safe rm" which would in fact use the shell's expansion of filenames but would ALSO look at the unexpanded version to check for likely typing errors. This is the main situation in which it's really important not to have to rely on the user quoting the command, because we are precisely worried about users who make a typing mistake, and requiring more attention to the typing doesn't help.

For the second case I can think of where I want uninterpreted *, namely restor (because I want it interpreted relative to the directory on the tape, not the directory on the disk), I'm willing to quote the *, if only restor knew what to do with it.

P.S. I vote for putting the uninterpreted command in an environment variable, rather than in argv, so that processes which are part of pipes or which are spawned by programs rather than directly by user commands can still see the command which was originally responsible for their creation.

P.P.S. I just added an environment variable called WHILE to both sh and csh which is nonzero when inside the range of a while or for or some such. (In sh it's the actual depth in loops; in csh it was easier to make it just 0 or 1.) In both cases, it just took one line of code, although in the case of sh I had to do about three hours of hard reading to figure out where to put the one line! The intent is to catch people who do while true do rogue done or the csh equivalent, to try to get around the restriction we've imposed on the number of simulataneous games.

----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/

This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.