Text File

Aucbvax.2413 fa.works utzoo!duke!decvax!ucbvax!works Thu Jul 23 01:56:33 1981 File Backup >From Joe.Newcomer@CMU-10A Wed Jul 22 23:56:57 1981 The Spice project plans to treat the local disk as a cache for the central file system. Thus, primary backup is handled by the same staff which backs up all our other systems. Local disks will not have substantive amounts of private data which is not replicated on the CFS.

In the case of workstations not on a network, if we abandon such archaic ideas as single-task workstations, files without timestamps, and similar absurdities, and produce some reasonably intelligent software, a background task which does hourly, daily, or as-needed backup to a floppy disk or other medium such as streaming tape, occasionally prompting the use to insert a new disk or tape, and which handles the grubby details of how to do file retrieval in case a file restoration is necessary seems the obvious simple solution. As I am currently thinking about having a personal 68000-based system at home, which will not be on a net- work, and cannot use CMU's machines for backup, this is one of the first pieces of software I would build. My plans are to simply assign ascending serial numbers to the floppies, and keep a file (which is naturally backed up) which is a migration archive file [CMU-10A users will recognize this as MIGRAT.DIR...]. Since all REAL computers (not toy computers, no matter how powerful) have date-time stamps which can go on files, the software architecture is reasonably obvious.

Those ridiculous systems in which one can save or restore the entire disk, but not do incremental save or restore, are not worth talking about. I certainly don't want to reset my entire disk to yesterday afternoon just because the system or I accidently damaged one file.

More sophisticated applications, including large databases, need more sophisticated incremental backup procedures. But these are ALL OBVIOUS and can be ALL AUTOMATED. Using "clerical people" or "professional people" means we've forgotten the best drudge of history: the computer itself. The overhead on anyone to write a serial number on an existing disk or streaming tape and insert a fresh one is so small as to be unnoticeable. (Of course, I would never consider the problem of "tying up the floppy drive" while doing backup; floppies are not reasonable as secondary storage for serious applications; they are far too small and slow compared to even the current processors they are mated with. I consider a 10Mb disk as small, but marginally acceptable, on a personal workstation. 24Mb is acceptable, 100Mb is reasonable. Floppies are at best a cheap backup medium, not to be used for serious storage. I have a small personal database which already exceeds 1Mb).

joe

----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/

This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.